Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Volume Description

     It is necessary to say that (Researcher  Journal for Legal Sciences) has adhered to conditions and rules that were characterized by objectivity, and its primary goal was to consolidate scientific research according to pre-defined mechanisms, including evaluation controls, expertise, publishing rules, correspondence procedures, research tracking, and electronic research requirements. The journal's editorial management was keen to implement it to the letter so that the journal would truly be a home for purposeful scientific production that is not mixed with impurities and is not affected by suspicions of scientific theft , in addition to following clear and objective procedures in submitting research and evaluation by relying on disciplined, transparent, impartial and confidential mechanisms. Its goal is to give confidence to the author of the sober research that his well-thought-out idea will find purely scientific evaluation tools far from all aspects of ugliness or intellectual distortion, and at the same time to reassure the relevant scientific and academic bodies. , especially the specialized scientific promotion committees in the various faculties of law (at home and abroad). What is published in the magazine is solid and valuable research, such that it meets the description of a peer-reviewed journal in terms of its truth and truth. Therefore, we can state, in support of what was mentioned above, that many of the research papers submitted to the magazine were rejected after they were sent to specialized experts who indicated that they were not suitable for publication. Also, there are research papers that were subject to evaluation and modification based on the observations sent by the scientific expert, so they did not have a share in the list. Journal entries only after the researcher takes them into consideration and reconsiders them, especially since the journal's editorial management was keen to review the relevant scientific expert so that he could grant publication permission for the research and to ensure that the researcher took into consideration all the amendments and observations previously mentioned in his scientific report so that the research would acquire its required scientific requirements. All of this is in recognition by the editorial board and editor-in-chief of the magazine that distinguishing between the bad and the bad in scientific research is the basis for the magazine's accreditation and an advancement in its solid intellectual output .

   In the same way as previous issues of the magazine, this issue contained various and different scientific research in various branches of private and public law. In private law, the research was tagged (regulatory change of the contract - an analytical study -) as well as (the problems of investment guarantees in oil service contracts - an analytical study A comparison in light of oil licensing round contracts) as well as the research tagged (financing the capital of the bank deposit guarantee company - a legal study in light of the effective Iraqi bank deposit guarantee system). As well as (voluntary liquidation of the bank - a comparative study -).

    As for public law, the research was tagged (the legislative role of the constitutional judiciary in monitoring legislative negligence - a study in Iraqi law and Egyptian law) and (the obligation of the public employee not to disclose the secrets of public office), as as well as (punishment in law and Sharia) and (the crime of recruiting children during conflicts). armed forces ).

    Judicial rulings had a place in this issue through commentary on them and a statement of the jurisprudential opinion regarding them, as the issue included two important comments on those rulings.                                                                                               

Editor-in-Chief